The next day
students present their poster projects. They take just a few minutes for each.
Essentially, they read off the bullet points they made the previous class. It
is just a review process. But I tell students to pay close attention to these
projects; there will be questions on the upcoming test about the different
aspects of Christology we have studied. Also, and I don’t tell them this yet,
they will write a reflection about one of the “ropes” we have studied.
I ask direct questions to guide
their review; the clever students take notes on my questions, in particular.
This is a simple review method. Maybe too simple. Like I said in the last blog,
I have modified this review process. My students are much too efficient and
goal oriented to spend too much time on projects like this. I am not opposed to
project-based learning; not if it is done right. But, at the same time, if the
notes are clear and the methodology is sound, students can learn just as well
or better with lecture and similar tools. My students often reveal to me that
they actually do not like projects; projects take a long time to learn few
things. I tend to agree. If the curriculum was more difficult or complex, maybe
I would use projects.
But there is more to the less
than just reading off the bullet points they gathered the previous class. I
made handouts for each of the topics students just presented on (Incarnation,
Jesus, Christ, Lord, Son of God, Formation of the Gospels, the Bible, Paschal
Mystery, Hypostatic Union, Covenant). I lay them all out on a table in the
classroom and I ask students to choose one of the topics that they feel they
know the most about. Once they have their selection, I take them to the chapel
and I instruct them to write a reflection. It turns out, this will be part of
the test grade. They need to write a one page reflection, explaining the
important information about the “rope” they chose, and then explain why that
particular aspect of Christology would help them, personally, to grow in a
relationship with God. I want something substantial. I want serious reflection.
I want thoughtfulness. Usually, that is what I get.
I can’t grade them on the depth
of the reflection. I can’t grade my students on how well they encounter God.
There are no rubrics for measuring Faith. But I can encourage thoughtfulness.
In fact, that may be the most important part of the entire course; the more
open they are, the more thoughtful they are, the more likely they are to Truly
grow in relationship with God.